re: This myth about Clemson untested

Personally, I have no issue with being #3. It's only fair. I'll also gladly admit that our schedule is dog shite. My issue is with two recurring arguments I keep seeing on TV and social media.

1) "Clemson is at a disadvantage because they are untested." I don't see how this argument keeps getting thrown around based on our results the last 4 years. Nothing further needs to be said on this gob shite.

2) "Clemson has an advantage because they show up to the playoff healthy and rested due to their dog shite schedule. SEC teams are beaten down after that grueling schedule". Between 2006-2012, the SEC won 7 national titles in a row. An unprecedented run of dominance that cemented the SEC at the top of the cfb world. This run seems highly unlikely if SEC teams were worn down like we're led to believe.

So, to wrap up: No, Clemson hasn't been tested but it doesn't matter. And when Clemson wins it all again, we don't need to hear about how tired/injured OSU or LSU was. LSU certainly didn't look tired against UGA.