Started By
Message
re: Which football team is more of a blue blood? UGA or LSU
Posted on 2/3/20 at 2:02 pm to Eli Goldfinger
Posted on 2/3/20 at 2:02 pm to Eli Goldfinger
UGA isn’t a blue blood, LSU maybe is, but one more natty in the next decade or so would seal it
UGA has one legitimate national title and one old iffy one, so I think they’d need to win 3 national championships to get in the conversation for blue blood. Granted that UGA being pretty consistently good helps their case, they have mostly avoided any sustained down years (unlike LSU pre 2000)
UGA has one legitimate national title and one old iffy one, so I think they’d need to win 3 national championships to get in the conversation for blue blood. Granted that UGA being pretty consistently good helps their case, they have mostly avoided any sustained down years (unlike LSU pre 2000)
1
Posted on 2/3/20 at 2:51 pm to Cocotheape
quote:
Granted that UGA being pretty consistently good helps their case, they have mostly avoided any sustained down years
They did have 4 losing seasons in a row in the 50s.
quote:
unlike LSU pre 2000
Prior to the 90s, LSU had never had more than two losing seasons in a row.
In 1990, LSU ranked 13th nationally in all-time winning percentage, while UGA ranked 17th.
LSU has historically been ranked ahead of UGA in all-time win%, and has never had a losing record in the series with UGA.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News