re: Which football team is more of a blue blood? UGA or LSU

Based on this thread, it seems the belief of many is that the list of "blue blood" teams is unchangeable. If that's the case, it sort of becomes an irrelevant, meaningless moniker.

Others have given a window for a changing list, but they explicitly exclude things such as total wins, win %, championships, All-Americans, NFL representation, and other seemingly relevant indicators, instead focusing on very subjective intangibles such as overall perception regardless of the above criteria. In that case, the window for change seems false, as the criteria for the intangibles apparently had to have been solidified 50-100 years ago.

Ultimately, it doesn't seem worth the time for the LSUs and UGAs of the world to worry too much about it.