re: Which football team is more of a blue blood? UGA or LSU

I'll admit I've not spent a lot of time hammering down the fine details on this. A few different sports news sites have tried to rank teams all-time based on criteria like conference and national titles, Heisman winners, reputation for putting players into the pros, all-time record, things like that. LSU, for its whole history, consistently sits just outside the top 10 in these rankings, and if you just took LSU from 2000 onward it'd easily be top-10.

Hence why I'm thinking another decade of success gets us there. At that point we'll have had 30 years of undisputed top-tier performance. People my age will have been around for half a lifetime and, as long as we were old enough to understand football and follow it, LSU will have been in the conversation with the top programs. Hard not to call a program like that a blueblood at that point IMO.