Started By
Message

re: Moorhead's rebuild? Really?

Posted on 11/22/19 at 3:49 pm to
Posted by cyarrr
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2017
3372 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

No.. Google states MS ST won 9. Dan was in UF at the end of Nov.


You’re just being contentious for arguments sake. He may have not coached in that game but his staff did and the result would most likely have been the same.

Additionally, regardless of State’s inept passing attack, the defense was loaded and the expectations were high.

Furthermore, Fitzgerald’s regression as a quarterback was most likely a result of Moorhead forcing him to adapt to his coaching scheme as opposed to Moorhead scheming to the strengths and abilities of Fitzgerald.

Based on the eye test, Moorhead seems to be in over his head and is failing miserably. Surely you cannot be happy with the results on the field or the efforts of this coaching staff.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53502 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

quote:
No.. Google states MS ST won 9. Dan was in UF at the end of Nov.



You’re just being contentious for arguments sake.


Not at all. I stated 8 games, you stated 9. Did he coach the last game or not?

quote:

He may have not coached in that game but his staff did and the result would most likely have been the same.


Actually no. They were not allowed to stay around due to recruiting. Special teams coordinator Greg Knox was made interim in Nov for the Jan 1 game. Knox, Elliott, Looney and others including cornerbacks coach Terrell Buckley and safeties coach Ron English .

The DC gone etc etc.

quote:

Additionally, regardless of State’s inept passing attack, the defense was loaded and the expectations were high.


Yep many hoped that Moorhead could help Fitz. But like it has been stated by more than me, they lost 2 NFL guys on offense, one being a NFL TE and 4 wrs out of 10. 2 others were injured and never the same.

I don't care who you are, with that roster, not much more could have been done. As pointed out by a state fan here. 2 games should have been won if Fitz could hit the broad side of a barn and the receivers DON'T drop 2 passes.

quote:

Furthermore, Fitzgerald’s regression as a quarterback was most likely a result of Moorhead forcing him to adapt to his coaching scheme as opposed to Moorhead scheming to the strengths and abilities of Fitzgerald.




Maybe you need to look a bit deeper. He's a career 53% passer. He didn't get that in a year where his % was 51.7%.

2016- 2,423 passing yards 21 TDs 10 ints
2017- 1,767 passing yards 15 Tds 11 ints

That's under Mullen. Regression?

Maybe you meant rushing yards and tds right?

2016- 1375...16 tds
2017- 984....14 tds.

Is that regression? roughly 1100 yards different. Does that look like an offense improving heading into Moorhead's tenure?



first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter