re: ESPN : Position U (BCS + CFP Era)

They don’t have to be consensus AAs and factor in varying levels of All SEC as well.

I think we can all agree their method is flawed in a big way but they’re not just looking at the highest achievers from a group (consensus AAs and pro bowlers) but also factoring in other categories meant to catch the middle pack players (problem is they’re awarding points based on certain levels of success that don’t actually correlate to the production on the field). For example, UGA is receiving more points for Knowshown being a consensus AA than any of Chubb, Michel, or Gurley being all conference which is absurd