Started By
Message
re: which "former glory" SEC team is least likely to ever be relevant again?
Posted on 5/8/19 at 8:18 pm to John Milner
Posted on 5/8/19 at 8:18 pm to John Milner
quote:
The more reasonable list is that one from ncaa.com that I linked before ncaa.com
It lists 15 for Alabama, rather than the 22 in the other. It lists 2 for UT and Auburn.
Personally, I'm good with just listing titles since 1936, when the legitimate news polls cranked up.
You may be good with it but, it's no good. Who are you to decide Alabama's '25, for instance, NC was invalid?
Just as football didn't start yesterday, football was played before polls were created and certain teams were acknowledged as having been the best.
1
Posted on 5/8/19 at 8:43 pm to TideHyde
quote:
Who are you to decide Alabama's '25, for instance, NC was invalid?
Do you have a link to me saying 1925 wasn't legitimate?
I said I would be ok with counting only the polls. Why? Because they are generally considered more legitimate than many of the others.
It's not even an important argument. Alabama has more national titles, at least since the 19th century, regardless how you count them.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News