Started By
Message

re: Richt vs Kirby after 3 years

Posted on 5/6/19 at 12:07 pm to
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 5/6/19 at 12:07 pm to
Out of curiosity, where are the Richt recruiting rankings coming from? I'm guessing maybe just one of Rivals or ESPN?

247 Composite shows those classes as:
2002 - 9th

2003 - 9th

2004 - 7th

Perhaps more importantly, here was the average rating of signed recruits by year:

2002: 86.58
2003: 86.41
2004: 89.81

Compared to

2017: 92.27
2018: 94.23
2019: 93.32

So in otherwords... Richt's *average* recruit was a low 4* to high 3* athlete - typically somewhere around 350 nationally. Smart's *average* recruit is a high 4* - typically somewhere around 150-200 nationally. That's not an insignificant differential.

FWIW though, Recruiting rankings in early 2000s also were not what they are now. Kids didn't get the same level of scrutiny... It was a lot easier to find 2* Thomas Davis and 3* David Pollack then than it is now.

As many have stated, if we had 15 years of year 1-3 Mark Richt, we'd have much different conversations about the last decade or so of UGA football. Smart, much like Richt will be defined by what he does over the long haul, not solely what he did in years 1-3.
Posted by NCDawg52
Atlanta, GA
Member since Dec 2014
3151 posts
Posted on 5/6/19 at 12:14 pm to
The delta between a top three class and a top ten class is massive. This has become even more pronounced in recent years.

Go look at the recent signing classes for Bama, UGA, OSU (not last year) and then compare to teams in the top ten. There is a massive disparity in talent.
Posted by Rabern57
Alabama
Member since Jan 2010
13375 posts
Posted on 5/6/19 at 12:18 pm to
Well that means Richt did as much with less.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter