Started By
Message
re: Boz please help us Bams understand what is going on in Ttown
Posted on 1/14/19 at 5:48 pm to jryanw
Posted on 1/14/19 at 5:48 pm to jryanw
Great you used examples against piss poor defenses and LSU which was before MSU exposed his tendencies.
We have specifically discussed Tua's performances after MSU's gameplan where they used delayed middle blitzs, CB blitzes and coverages changes after the snap to expose us.
Every team after than used some or all of this against Tua and our offense.
BTW, the reason you analyze the plays things go wrong is to analyze what you did wrong, adapt and get better.
We have specifically discussed Tua's performances after MSU's gameplan where they used delayed middle blitzs, CB blitzes and coverages changes after the snap to expose us.
Every team after than used some or all of this against Tua and our offense.
BTW, the reason you analyze the plays things go wrong is to analyze what you did wrong, adapt and get better.
1
Posted on 1/15/19 at 9:17 am to YStar
YStar - Let me see if I follow what you're saying.
Pre-snap read of coverage allows Tua to make play changes, set routes for that coverage, which has multiple routes with priorities assigned to the routes (1st read, 2nd read, etc.). Tua has performed well in this scenario. 1st read is covered, moves to next available/open receiver.
The better defenses we played later in the year (MSU, UGA and Clemson) showed one coverage/blitz package pre-snap and changed post snap.
You're not saying he had trouble going to check-downs based on pre-snap coverage that didn't change. Your issue is with his ability to adapt to the post-snap change and how it impacted his primary target/read.
And Oklahoma's defense sucked so bad --- it didn't really matter.
Am I off target here?
Pre-snap read of coverage allows Tua to make play changes, set routes for that coverage, which has multiple routes with priorities assigned to the routes (1st read, 2nd read, etc.). Tua has performed well in this scenario. 1st read is covered, moves to next available/open receiver.
The better defenses we played later in the year (MSU, UGA and Clemson) showed one coverage/blitz package pre-snap and changed post snap.
You're not saying he had trouble going to check-downs based on pre-snap coverage that didn't change. Your issue is with his ability to adapt to the post-snap change and how it impacted his primary target/read.
And Oklahoma's defense sucked so bad --- it didn't really matter.
Am I off target here?
Page 1 of 1
Latest Alabama News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News