Started By
Message
Better QB, Hurts or Bryant?
Posted on 1/11/19 at 10:01 am
Posted on 1/11/19 at 10:01 am
(no message)
4
Posted on 1/11/19 at 10:05 am to MIZ_COU
Jalen. Both are close as far as passers(hurts still has the nod), but Hurts is a much better runner.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 10:06 am to mizslu314
Hurts is transferring. Can we trade Bryant in?
Posted on 1/11/19 at 10:07 am to MIZ_COU
Bryant is better because he is the one that's on the fricken team.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 10:09 am to MIZ_COU
I think so. We could trade Bryant and downing for Hurts straight up
Posted on 1/11/19 at 10:12 am to mizslu314
Posted on 1/11/19 at 10:14 am to MIZ_COU
I actually think Bryant is better for Mizzou and Hurts would be better for a team like Kentucky.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 10:16 am to blueprint_one
Would be our luck he winds up in the east
Posted on 1/11/19 at 10:19 am to surgicalvenom
THAT wasn’t the question...
Hurts is probably better overall and now more developed than Bryant as a passer.
Jalen is the tougher and prolly more durable runner.
Bryant more explosive.
Hurts is probably better overall and now more developed than Bryant as a passer.
Jalen is the tougher and prolly more durable runner.
Bryant more explosive.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 10:22 am to Athos
Hurt in my opinion, because he has improved his passing accuracy. I'm cool with Bryant, because he's who we have.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 10:38 am to MIZ_COU
They are the same player. You couldn't go wrong with either one as an OC with good slot/TE play.
This post was edited on 1/11/19 at 10:41 am
Posted on 1/11/19 at 10:42 am to navynuke
I haven't seen Bryant much
I take your word for it
I take your word for it
This post was edited on 1/11/19 at 10:45 am
Posted on 1/11/19 at 11:12 am to MIZ_COU
Hurts was coached to be a lot quicker pulling it down if the early progression wasn't there with second level defenders turned away from the ball. Bryant was allowed to extend plays outside the pocket and make some throws down field before taking off.
Neither one are going to be expected to make a bunch of 15 yard throws outside the hash.
Neither one are going to be expected to make a bunch of 15 yard throws outside the hash.
This post was edited on 1/11/19 at 11:13 am
Posted on 1/11/19 at 11:18 am to Athos
Well then let me break it down in a way that is acceptable to you:
Both QB's play a similar style but their success is augmented by being surrounded by top talent, so who really knows where their skillset lies with lesser explosive talent.
Both loss their starting jobs to Blue Chip recruits. But both those recruits have played for a NC so no shame there.
Therefore, as a tie breaker, I look at off field advantages. Bryant chose Mizzou which raised Mizzou's profile. That's never a bad thing, Hurts will bring attention to someone else.
Bryant is the defacto better choice.
Both QB's play a similar style but their success is augmented by being surrounded by top talent, so who really knows where their skillset lies with lesser explosive talent.
Both loss their starting jobs to Blue Chip recruits. But both those recruits have played for a NC so no shame there.
Therefore, as a tie breaker, I look at off field advantages. Bryant chose Mizzou which raised Mizzou's profile. That's never a bad thing, Hurts will bring attention to someone else.
Bryant is the defacto better choice.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 12:19 pm to navynuke
I'm going to miss seeing that long pretty ball
Posted on 1/11/19 at 1:01 pm to MIZ_COU
quote:
Better QB, Hurts or Bryant?
It's a push
Posted on 1/11/19 at 1:10 pm to Zou brownmajic
It never is
Posted on 1/11/19 at 4:37 pm to surgicalvenom
quote:
Well then let me break it down in a way that is acceptable to you:
Both QB's play a similar style but their success is augmented by being surrounded by top talent, so who really knows where their skillset lies with lesser explosive talent.
Both loss their starting jobs to Blue Chip recruits. But both those recruits have played for a NC so no shame there.
Therefore, as a tie breaker, I look at off field advantages. Bryant chose Mizzou which raised Mizzou's profile. That's never a bad thing, Hurts will bring attention to someone else.
Bryant is the defacto better choice.
Bryant lost to a rookie quarterback that maybe the best quarterback ever seen in a long time! So I am going with Bryant. Plus Bryant should be able to help Missouri with some ideas he had learned from coaches at Clemson.
This post was edited on 1/11/19 at 9:42 pm
Posted on 1/11/19 at 7:36 pm to MIZ_COU
They seem very similar to me honestly.
Dangerous runners, averagish passers.
I’m happy with Bryant.
Dangerous runners, averagish passers.
I’m happy with Bryant.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News