Started By
Message
re: Clemson asterisk?
Posted on 1/6/19 at 3:36 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Posted on 1/6/19 at 3:36 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
labama has three guys out for likely the same thing. FWIW.
Not the same thing Brown’s is likely pot
2
Posted on 1/6/19 at 3:43 pm to Bama54
quote:
Not the same thing Brown’s is likely pot
They just need to get rid of this rule. It's as if literally nobody in the NCAA/conference leadership has ever smoked pot and everything they know about it stems from 1930s propaganda movies. Pot is in no way a performance enhancer. Hell, enough use and it will hurt long-term performance. I could see the problem if players were popping PCP in pre-game warm-ups, but pot? You're just punishing players for lowering their ability to perform, be aggressive, and not lie on the turf laughing every time someone uses "inside route" and "wide receivers" in the same sentence.
Posted on 1/6/19 at 5:31 pm to Bama54
quote:
Not the same thing Brown’s is likely pot
Maybe. Maybe not. We don’t know because Alabama didn’t make a stir about it like Clemson.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News