Started By
Message
re: Why did we run 4 plays before half with 3 timeouts??
Posted on 11/24/18 at 7:43 pm to trinidadtiger
Posted on 11/24/18 at 7:43 pm to trinidadtiger
I was assured by the smartest Gus-tard Fellators around that that was the smartest thing to do at that point.
Because taking a chance was risky! RISKY! RISKY!
Because taking a chance was risky! RISKY! RISKY!
2
Posted on 11/24/18 at 7:48 pm to beatbammer
Play conservative. We are down by three, and they are getting the ball to start the second half, thats not conservative thats a coma. At least try a few patented screens, or throw it away deep a few times.
Posted on 11/24/18 at 7:49 pm to beatbammer
Our QB sucked all game. No way he could have moved the ball in that amt of time.
Sack fumble is what would have happened. Not to mention Stidham has to be forced to throw it deep.
I still would have tried something, but you got the feeling we couldn’t pass deep at that point. Stidham complaining is hilarious.
Sack fumble is what would have happened. Not to mention Stidham has to be forced to throw it deep.
I still would have tried something, but you got the feeling we couldn’t pass deep at that point. Stidham complaining is hilarious.
Page 1 of 1
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News