Started By
Message

re: Why eliminating FCS games is easier said than done.

Posted on 11/14/18 at 11:41 am to
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26996 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Look at Sagarin rankings - above average FCS teams from good leagues are generally in the same stratosphere as middling and bad teams from the Sun Belt, Mountain West, MAC and CUSA.

Now, I wish we'd only play 1 or 2 of these buy games, but I think it's silly to specifically hold out the FCS games as if they are somehow drastically worse than playing Georgia State or Ball State. I know they have less scholarships, but the play on the field is not all that much different.



Out of all four of those conferences, the only team that would have been available to Alabama, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, and USCe would have been Old Dominion...yeah, not really any better than most FCS teams. And who would the other four have played.

You could have made all 14 play conference games, but I think most schools would not want that imposed on them. I don't think Alabama is going to want to have to play and SEC game on this weekend. But if everyone is doing it, at least it's equitable.
This post was edited on 11/14/18 at 11:45 am
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 11:43 am to
quote:

would have been Old Dominion...yeah, not really any better than most FCS teams.


Yep, they rank behind Nicholls State, North Dakota, New Hampshire, Indiana State, Maine, Montana State and Furman per Sagarin.

Again, my point isn't that this makes it ok to play FCS teams, I just don't see why people have divided to draw this magical line that FCS teams are somehow drastically worse than bad non-Power 5 teams. It's just kind of silly.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter