Started By
Message
re: Why are there no neutral sites played in California?
Posted on 7/25/18 at 11:36 am to OKTGR580
Posted on 7/25/18 at 11:36 am to OKTGR580
Two big reasons, off the top of my head:
(a) For any SEC team playing a west coast team, it hardly seems like any California site could be considered neutral.
(b) The left coast is an expensive as heck trip for one game/poor ROI
(a) For any SEC team playing a west coast team, it hardly seems like any California site could be considered neutral.
(b) The left coast is an expensive as heck trip for one game/poor ROI
This post was edited on 7/25/18 at 11:41 am
Posted on 7/25/18 at 12:46 pm to EKG
quote:
(b) The left coast is an expensive as heck trip for one game/poor ROI
Current neutral site obviously cover travel along with payouts to each team...not an issue.A bigger factor is finding a corporate sponser.CFA spends millions on CFB every year and not sure if west coast/silicon Valley corporations care that much about CFB.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News