Started By
Message

re: Non-Hurts topic re: 92 defense

Posted on 5/7/18 at 3:09 pm to
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 5/7/18 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Hurts wouldn't have been able to pass against the 92 defense


He'd need an OC to scheme around his issues with not yet being born.

Maybe Kiffin.
This post was edited on 5/7/18 at 3:10 pm
Posted by Bamainva40
Member since Nov 2017
1677 posts
Posted on 5/8/18 at 5:56 am to
I agree , depth would be the only concern. They were fast , were rarely out of position and had the elements that you need today ...Pass rush and ability to cover. They were impossible to run on also.
Posted by IB4bama
Pelham
Member since Oct 2017
1979 posts
Posted on 5/8/18 at 8:30 am to
There were a ton of 3 and outs by the 92D. And we just ran the ball on offense to shorten the game. We didn't have many subs on the D line though. I remember that Curry had lost a good bit of weight by the end of the year. He could get to a QB in a hurry though.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter