No, those were QBs who could run. Ark has some of the best RBs the league has seen and they have nothing to show for it. LSU has always had a running back, but the last 6-8 years the QB has cost them. OU proved that last year against you, that you can still be competitive with a bad D as long as you have a QB.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by meansonny

ATL

Member since Sep 2012

25753 posts

Posted on 4/22/18 at 11:33 pm to Irons Puppet

quote:
quote:
Hey simpleton. Newton, Tebow, Martin... those are running QBs.

No, those were QBs who could run.

You are attempting Ludacrous Speed.

When a QB runs for 170+ attempts, he is a running QB. Any argument otherwise is an attempt at making a stupid comment to cover up for your earlier dumbass comment. Congratulations. You are either too proud to admit you are wrong or too stupid to comprehend the basics of football. Knowing you are an auburn fan, I will stick with the belief that you are too stupid because you can't focus on what is important with Bama and UGA constantly teabagging your team.

quote:
OU proved that last year against you, that you can still be competitive with a bad D as long as you have a QB.

OU ran for 33 rushing touchdowns last season. Only 1 behind Auburn. That is a good running team. And for that, they earned a trip to the rose bowl. Defense was their weakness. Especially against the run. UGA beat Oklahoma with 300+ rushing yards and 5 rushing touchdowns.

My point still stands.

2 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board