Started By
Message
re: The changing of the Blue-Bloods
Posted on 4/18/18 at 2:56 pm to thunderbird1100
Posted on 4/18/18 at 2:56 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Doesn't mean they aren't a historically good program, but to me, to maintain being a blue blood, you cant go decade+ long hiatuses presently and still call yourself definitively one
Ohio State football went 34 years without a NC...does that count?
2
Posted on 4/18/18 at 2:58 pm to RD Dawg
I never said it's about just winning national titles, read the whole post
I consider OU definitely a blue blood and they havent won one in 17 years, but they've had several great seasons since then and havent faded off for an extended period of time like others have
I consider OU definitely a blue blood and they havent won one in 17 years, but they've had several great seasons since then and havent faded off for an extended period of time like others have
This post was edited on 4/18/18 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 4/18/18 at 7:56 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
Ohio State football went 34 years without a NC...does that count?
But had a bunch of teams that were in the hunt. Great teams. Woody Hayes teams in the early '70s that lost or tied one game. And teams in the 90's that had NFL talent out the ying yang like Orlando pace, mike vrabal, Eddie George, Joey Galloway and terry glenn.
Also dozens of top 5 AP final polls.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News