Started By
Message
re: The changing of the Blue-Bloods
Posted on 4/18/18 at 1:54 pm to samson73103
Posted on 4/18/18 at 1:54 pm to samson73103
quote:I truly do not understand taking pride in something that happened waaaaaaaaaay before I was born
If your team had actually done anything before your parents could walk you would understand. So few fans of rival programs understand Bama tradition because so few other programs can match it.
LSUs boxing titles really dont do it for me
Posted on 4/19/18 at 6:54 am to lsupride87
quote:
lsupride87
I truly do not understand taking pride in something that happened waaaaaaaaaay before I was born
Of course you wouldn’t understand
Posted on 4/19/18 at 9:18 am to lsupride87
quote:
I truly do not understand taking pride in something that happened waaaaaaaaaay before I was born
I am guessing you don't celebrate Christmas, 4th of July etc?
quote:And if they won a boxing title this year, would that title do it for you? No, because it is boxing, not because of the timeline.
LSUs boxing titles really dont do it for me
But I agree with WG. Bluebloods are for teams who have had sustained success ove the years, not just a blip of a 10 year strong period.
Ohio State
Texas
USCw
Alabama
Notre Dame
Michigan
Oklahoma
I would say if Michigan and Texas does not break through to become a serious power again, they are in danger of losing Blueblood status. I can't thin of any other teams that really deserve being added o the group. There could be some teams considered to be second tier that, if they went on a sustained streak might be considered.
LSU
Florida
Auburn
Georgia
Nebraska (Dropped them from Blueblood for lack of any success lately)
Clemson (A long way to go, though)
Miami
FSU (Maybe closest)
Penn State
Tennessee (Very close but fading)
This post was edited on 4/19/18 at 9:21 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News