re: Gamecocks, was it worth it?

quote:

---

'Everybody' doesn't think like that.

I know soccer was most popular sport at my high school in Florence.

Clemson has been good in soccer since early 1970s....it isn't just 'recent' success.

Baseball and soccer are nowhere near basketball and football for most people. The reason you talk about baseball is SC won two titles, and there isn't much to talk about regarding football and basketball.

I had to dig the other day to find baseball scores on ESPN and many of the scores were not posted during the games. The baseball scores are listed under 'College Sports'. College baseball doesn't even get its own heading on the frontpage of ESPN.

I personally don't care about soccer or baseball.

---

No, you're just too stupid to realize how stupid you really are. Of course you're naming soccer over baseball, because Clemson has had success in soccer and not much (if at all) in baseball. But you're pretty blatant....

Even in the 2015-16 season - the season Clemson lost to Stanford in the soccer championship game, Clemson baseball pulled a higher attendance than the soccer did. And it's the same for every season before and afterwards.

Why is that? It's because not everyone else is as stupid as you are. Baseball reigns supreme in the Southeast over soccer, regardless what you think. You're welcome to keep on thinking it too, because you look better to me being the stupid one. But even your own pathetic fanbase thinks you're stupid in this regard......