Started By
Message
re: Should Oklahoma or Clemson have been left out of the top 4?
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:27 pm to ColoBama
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:27 pm to ColoBama
I think Clemson would have been ranked about 5th in the old BCS system. No way they would have been a top 3 team 5 years ago with a terrible loss to Syracuse. Oklahoma would probably been number 1 with Georgia maybe number 2. Makes the loss last night even more difficult, but what you gonna do?
2
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:28 pm to BossDawg2424
quote:
I think Clemson would have been ranked about 5th in the old BCS system. No way they would have been a top 3 team 5 years ago with a terrible loss to Syracuse. Oklahoma would probably been number 1 with Georgia maybe number 2. Makes the loss last night even more difficult, but what you gonna do?
Good point. But, if you look at 2014, it would have been Bama and Florida St in the BCSNCG.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 8:02 pm to BossDawg2424
there is no way a team that had just dominated SC and Miami would have been 5th. lol
Clemosn would have beat Cuse if Bryant's leg was healthy and they almost won it despite that.
Georgia got destroyed by Auburn, a team Clemson beat. Yet you say UGA should be 2? lol
UGA played the weakest schedule this year. that's why i predicted they would be in the playoffs.
Clemosn would have beat Cuse if Bryant's leg was healthy and they almost won it despite that.
Georgia got destroyed by Auburn, a team Clemson beat. Yet you say UGA should be 2? lol
UGA played the weakest schedule this year. that's why i predicted they would be in the playoffs.
This post was edited on 1/9/18 at 8:03 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News