Started By
Message

re: Do you accept the notion of the Big Bang as the origin of our universe?

Posted on 1/5/18 at 1:24 pm to
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 1/5/18 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

The proven part to the best of my knowledge doesn’t go back to t=0 though and that’s where a lot of the questions about it from doubters arise. Our models and equations track it back to a tiny fraction of a second after, but we don’t have a unifying theory yet to get beck to the absolute beginning.


To me, our observations of the Universe alone are evidence enough that we began from a single point. That we can see light, in all directions, that began its journey to us more than 13 billion years ago is proof positive that there was once a central point of origin.

While the math ultimately leads to a singularity in the past, I suspect that people like Edward Witten will find the error(s) soon and lead us past the BB and into the pre BB.

quote:

What’s incredible also and what I don’t think a lot of people realize is the speed of the inflation right after. Everything (including spacetime?) expanded outwards to create the vast expanses that we see today in a very short period of time. Question though, would that initial expansion be faster than light? The speed of c wasn’t established until after the Bang?


The speed-of-light barrier applies only to the movement of matter and energy through space. It has no relevance to space itself, except that perhaps it's space that applies the speed-of-light restriction to matter and energy.

The discovery of the Higgs Boson in 2012 confirmed that the Higgs Field exists and is a physical entity. Space is made up of the Higgs Field and seems to be independent from the field that generates matter and energy. Thus it isn't subject to the speed-of-light restriction itself.
This post was edited on 1/5/18 at 1:28 pm
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29513 posts
Posted on 1/5/18 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

The speed-of-light barrier applies only to the movement of matter and energy through space. It has no relevance to space itself, except that perhaps it's space that applies the speed-of-light restriction to matter and energy.

The discovery of the Higgs Boson in 2012 confirmed that the Higgs Field exists and is a physical entity. Space is made up of the Higgs Field and seems to be independent from the field that generates matter and energy. Thus it isn't subject to the speed-of-light restriction itself.



Before inflation there was no space though (big assumption). The Big Bang was the inflation of space itself which carried the remaining matter (after the matter/antimatter collisions wiped most of everything out), so since that is space itself that is "blowing up" so to speak it's not traveling through any kind of medium, it would be traveling through true nothingness. As a result would it be possible for space itself to travel faster than light?

I'm sure I'm totally off base on most of that..
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter