Started By
Message
re: Horrible job by the committee
Posted on 11/16/17 at 8:29 am to jcljag
Posted on 11/16/17 at 8:29 am to jcljag
Clemson is where they are because they’ve played a tough schedule, beating more teams with a winning record than anybody in college football.
That used to be all that mattered when it was SEC teams that could say that.....
With the 5th ranked schedule nobody else is even close to Clemson in the top 10 of the Sagarin rankings except Notre Dame.
LINK
That used to be all that mattered when it was SEC teams that could say that.....
With the 5th ranked schedule nobody else is even close to Clemson in the top 10 of the Sagarin rankings except Notre Dame.
LINK
2
Posted on 11/16/17 at 8:33 am to DannyByGodFord
quote:
Clemson is where they are because they’ve played a tough schedule, beating more teams with a winning record than anybody in college football. That used to be all that mattered when it was SEC teams that could say that..... With the 5th ranked schedule nobody else is even close to Clemson in the top 10 of the Sagarin rankings except Notre Dame.
Clemson is 1-0 vs the Top 10, 5-0 vs the Top 30, 8-0 vs the Top 50 and 1-1 vs 31-130 (loss to #56)
Oklahoma is 1-0 vs the Top 10, 4-1 vs the Top 30, 6-1 vs the Top 50 and 3-0 vs 51-130 (loss to #24)
Yea, I'd go with Oklahoma
This post was edited on 11/16/17 at 8:35 am
Posted on 11/16/17 at 12:17 pm to DannyByGodFord
DannyF. Why not have Clemson rated 2 all along? Beating Fsu should do nothing to really help your ranking. Now that Clemson moves to 2 the injury to Bryant suddenly matters and is a focus for the committee. When they moved Clemson to 2, they realized they needed to justify the move. If not have your qb against a 4-6 team makes that a good loss, then that does not say much about Clemson
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News