quote:
Contradicting how? Your comment was meant in a figurative, or hyperbolic way, and I still disagree with it even on that level. I have said what "I meant to say" since page 1 of this thread.

Then you need some help with your debate skills. You're not following logically.

Original thread topic: We need a WR who does other things.

Me: We have lots of great WR's. We're just not using them.

You: Hurts passed to 5 guys on Saturday.

Me: I wasn't talking about one game.

You: It doesn't matter. Your point is bad.

Me: My point was we're only using one WR. How is that point wrong?

You: Now I'll admit we're only using one WR, but he's the best one, so it's a good thing.

Me: So, are we only using one or not?

You: I sense a trap. You should have said we use Ridley more, not exclusively.

Me: You thought I literally meant we only threw the ball to one WR ever?

You: It doesn't matter what you said or meant, you're wrong.

Me: Can you explain that?

You: We don't just use one. We do use Ridley a lot more, but that's good.

Me: So, you thought I literally meant we only throw the ball to one WR ever?

You: I know what you mean, but you're wrong.

Then, more rehashing of the same.

This post was edited on 11/13/17 at 10:27 am

2 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by Funky Tide 8

Bayou Chico

Member since Feb 2009

53441 posts

Posted on 11/13/17 at 10:29 am to Teague

quote:

Me: I wasn't talking about one game.

You: It doesn't matter. You point is bad.

you missed my point on this. It "didn't matter" because he has passed to multiple WRs in the last few games, as well.

quote:
Me: My point was we're only using one WR. How is that point wrong? You: Now I'll admit we're only using one WR, but he's the best one, so it's a good thing.

I never admitted this. I stated that, sure, we use 1 more than the others, which is perfectly normal.

quote:
Me: So, are we only using one or not? You: I sense a trap. You should have said we use Ridley more, not exclusively.

you are completely skewing what I've been saying. I NEVER ONCE said that we use only one WR. I said that we use one more than the others, which is completely different than what you are claiming that I said. Which is what you are trying to use for the basis of what you are trying to say here.

I get that you didn't literally mean that we only have passed to one WR, but you said it figuratively in a derogatory way, and I disagree that it is a bad thing.

This post was edited on 11/13/17 at 10:57 am

1 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by CrimsonBoz