Started By
Message

re: How Would TCU Finish This Year If They Were In The SEC?

Posted on 9/12/17 at 2:43 pm to
Posted by Not Afraid of Bama
Member since Sep 2017
71 posts
Posted on 9/12/17 at 2:43 pm to
You are missing the point.
The PAC 12 determines the price it sells its product for. ESPN pays the SEC a yearly fee.

So it is quite possible if UT and OU joined the PAC 12 the PAC 12 could sell their PAC 12 network to the cable and satellite providers at a higher cost
Plus they can sell commercial space at a higher cost meaning more money for the PAC 12 network.

The biggest issue between UT and the PAC 12 remains the network. People think that once the LHN ends with ESPN UT will manipulate the ESPN into giving UT a bigger contract again by using the PAC 12 but this remains to be seen.
Posted by Not Afraid of Bama
Member since Sep 2017
71 posts
Posted on 9/12/17 at 2:50 pm to
If what you said was true then UT would have been in the PAC 12. Then UT controls 100% of the Texas Oklahoma PAC 12 network.
That was not what the PAC 12 network is. It is not 6 different networks. It has 6 different versions of one network and just because SC and UCLA can sell their product at a higher cost doesn't mean they get more money than their conference counterparts
This post was edited on 9/12/17 at 2:51 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter