Started By
Message
re: the criticism on jalen hurts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 1:54 pm to Funky Tide 8
Posted on 9/8/17 at 1:54 pm to Funky Tide 8
quote:
I wouldn't choose that douche canoe Mett over Hurts in a million years either.
I mean Mett was a statue, I get that, but a FAR better passer than Hurts. And Mett played in more NFL games than Hurts likely will (at QB anyway).
That being said, I have no problem with Hurts. Guy is out there doing his best. He has won a lot of games. In a conversation about best passers, his name isn't up there, but he is a great player, a winner, and from what I can tell a good person.
2
Posted on 9/8/17 at 1:56 pm to PurpleandGeauld
Mett over Hurts imo. Hurts can destroy a bad defense on the ground but he just isn't gonna beat you with his arm. Jalen won't sniff the NFL as a quarterback.
Posted on 9/8/17 at 6:15 pm to PurpleandGeauld
quote:
I mean Mett was a statue, I get that, but a FAR better passer than Hurts.
Their first year starter passing stats:
Mett:
207/352 @ 58.8 % for 2609 yards, 12 TDs and 7 INTs
Hurts:
240/382 @ 62.8 percent for 2780 yards, 23 TDs 9 INTs(Hurts played in two more games I think)
One was a true freshman, and one was a redshirt Junior.
One had a future NFL superstar to throw to, as well as another NFL WR1 at his disposal.
Ridley might prove to be a really good NFL WR, and Stewart has a lot of potential, but not really comparable to ODB and JL at the moment.
quote:
And Mett played in more NFL games than Hurts likely will (at QB anyway).
Says you?
This post was edited on 9/8/17 at 6:20 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News