it's a given that hurts' talents are good enough at Alabama to win. no one is questioning that. no one is questioning nick's decision to play Hurts.

I would choose etling over hurts. AND I would choose Bentley, fromm and stidham over etling.

would florida state be better with hurts? southern cal? Oklahoma? not no, but hell, no. hurts would flop.

Alabama fans, you have a good quarterback for Alabama. that's going to have to be good enough for you. I don't think he's good enough to win the natty without last year's defense, but that's just my opinion. I do think he can get you back to the playoffs with the defense and special teams you have now.

This post was edited on 9/8/17 at 12:53 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by SummerOfGeorge

Member since Jul 2013

102699 posts

Posted on 9/8/17 at 12:56 pm to stephendomalley

quote:
I would choose etling over hurts.

I wouldn't in 1 million years.

quote:
I would choose Bentley

I agree, I would too. I think he's the best NFL prospect in the SEC.

quote:
fromm

Little early to make that call

quote:
stidham

Little early to make that call too

quote:
would florida state be better with hurts?

Than Francois? I think they'd be pretty similar

quote:
southern cal? Oklahoma?

No, they both have Heisman trophy contending QBs, one of which will be a Top 5 NFL pick next year and the other would be as well if he wasn't 5'10''. Anybody with a brain wouldn't say Hurts is as good as those guys are right now.

Hurts is a progressing, raw QB. We hope he has improved from 2016. We really aren't sure yet. Again, it's ok to say he had a solid freshman year and needs to make some specific improvements this year. He doesn't have to be better than Darnold and Mayfield OR be the worst QB in the league.

1 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board