Started By
Message

re: 1974 OU and 1993 Auburn

Posted on 7/26/17 at 11:34 pm to
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37631 posts
Posted on 7/26/17 at 11:34 pm to
Posted by FourThreeForty
Member since May 2013
17290 posts
Posted on 7/26/17 at 11:38 pm to
Anyone noticed how all of Auburn's best years in school history start with a 3 or 4....and if it's not 3 or 4 it's 3+4...
Posted by phil4bama
Emerald Coast of PCB
Member since Jul 2011
11470 posts
Posted on 7/26/17 at 11:45 pm to
Maybe because 1974 Oklahoma had lost 2 games in 4 years and had a record over that period of 44-2-1. They were also in the midst of one of the greatest runs in college football history during the 70's and were considered a perennial top 5 team.

Auburn's record over their previous 4 years was 29-14-2 and were transitioning from Pat Dye to Tater Tot and were considered a fluke or a flash in the pan; a good team, but nothing special. They were coming off consecutive non-winning seasons. Big difference.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter