Started By
Message

re: Why was Bama so bad from 1992 til 2009 (sans 1999)?

Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:11 pm to
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:11 pm to
The source is rolltide.com, you dolt.

LINK
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:12 pm to
98, 99, 92, 98, 98, 99 and 100 percents of capacity for games that year (98% for the year in total), with the only game under 98% being a game against 1AA Western Carolina.

In a 6-6 year following a 4-9 year (in which every game was sold out) while on probation.

I'm content with that type of support.
This post was edited on 7/14/17 at 3:14 pm
Posted by ForeverGator
Elite 8 - 2020 Worst SECRant Poster
Member since Nov 2012
13225 posts
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:13 pm to
STOP SHOWING BAMA FANS FACTS. THEY DON'T UNDERSTAND IT UNLESS IT'S MADE UP IN THEIR HEADS.
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72343 posts
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

The source is rolltide.com, you dolt.

LINK


Well you initially linked wikipedia. And you're splitting hairs over 98% attendance in 2004. When 2003, 2005, and 2006 was 100% under the shame coaching staff. And same source to cite it.

And your new link is broken.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter