Started By
Message
re: Fire chad Holbrook
Posted on 5/15/17 at 7:25 am to theGarnetWay
Posted on 5/15/17 at 7:25 am to theGarnetWay
I'm not saying USC should keep Holbrook or am I saying he's the next Tanner, but to be fair - what Tanner did the 3 years prior to his moving to AD can't be expected to be duplicated by anyone - it was an amazing 3-year run predicated upon a couple back-to-back great recruiting classes.
The 5 years prior to winning the first - they failed to get to Omaha.
Again - not saying USC should keep or not keep Holbrook, but many fans in the SEC have completely unrealistic expectations.
The 5 years prior to winning the first - they failed to get to Omaha.
Again - not saying USC should keep or not keep Holbrook, but many fans in the SEC have completely unrealistic expectations.
2
Posted on 5/15/17 at 7:28 am to Tom Haverford
quote:
Again - not saying USC should keep or not keep Holbrook, but many fans in the SEC have completely unrealistic expectations.
We have now lost 7 SEC series 2 out of the past 3 years. We NEVER lost this many series during any season under Ray Tanner, even during Tanner's "bad" years.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:19 am to Tom Haverford
quote:
Again - not saying USC should keep or not keep Holbrook, but many fans in the SEC have completely unrealistic expectations.
understood. at the same time, when your baseball coaching pedigree is the 3 men sitting to the left of Chad
...dating back to 1970 with native son Bobby Richardson - it's okay for Gamecock Baseball and its fans to expect more than what Holbrook has produced.
the characteristics/traits that exist with Holbrook's teams couldn't be further from those which Richardson, Raines & Tanner displayed in playing championship baseball - year in, year out.
This post was edited on 5/15/17 at 9:21 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News