Started By
Message

re: Ole Miss denies FOI "We don't have the NOA" LOL!

Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:36 am to
Posted by HottyToddy7
Member since Sep 2010
14045 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:36 am to
Fight that mother fricker to your last breath. NCAA has been corrupt through the whole thing.

Were we speeding? Yep.

Were we in the flow of traffic? Yes as well.

Were we in a Lambo going 150 on the shoulder flicking off the NCAA, hell no. And the NOA proves that.

Should we get punished, yes but for what they can prove. It's funny how they opened the investigation back up because of draft night and Tunsil is nowhere on the NOA and 90% of the NOA was from immunity given to rival players.

Tunsil was given to them on a silver platter and they couldn't close. You don't think they didn't cross the line to "save face"?
Posted by Crimson Legend
Mount St Gumpus
Member since Nov 2004
15478 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Fight that mother fricker to your last breath. NCAA has been corrupt through the whole thing.

Were we speeding? Yep.

Were we in the flow of traffic? Yes as well.

Were we in a Lambo going 150 on the shoulder flicking off the NCAA, hell no. And the NOA proves that.

Should we get punished, yes but for what they can prove. It's funny how they opened the investigation back up because of draft night and Tunsil is nowhere on the NOA and 90% of the NOA was from immunity given to rival players.

Tunsil was given to them on a silver platter and they couldn't close. You don't think they didn't cross the line to "save face"?


Posted by Hugh McElroy
Member since Sep 2013
17765 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Were we in the flow of traffic? Yes as well.


With all due respect, you are in complete denial.
Posted by bamasgot13
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2010
13619 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Were we speeding? Yep.

Putting it mildly.

quote:

Were we in the flow of traffic? Yes as well.

Love this argument. It's not provable in any real way, but it makes Ole Miss feel better about themselves. Have at it fellas.

quote:

Were we in a Lambo going 150 on the shoulder flicking off the NCAA, hell no. And the NOA proves that.

How the hell would you know what the NOA proves? You've not seen it and none of us will for another 75+ days.

quote:

Should we get punished, yes but for what they can prove.

You will get punished, and it will be for what they can prove, as well as for what they believe (i.e. LOIC).

quote:

It's funny how they opened the investigation back up because of draft night and Tunsil is nowhere on the NOA and 90% of the NOA was from immunity given to rival players.

There are 21 football violations (that we know about). 8 of those came as a result of the extended investigation/immunity deals. Not sure how that equates to 90%.

You need to begin to face reality. You'll lose more than the 11 scholarships self imposed. You'll lose more than 1 season of bowl play. You'll take 5+ years to get back to the level you were in 2014/2015. The possibility of your coach being suspended for some period of time is also real.
Posted by Grim
Member since Dec 2013
12302 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Were we in a Lambo going 150 on the shoulder flicking off the NCAA, hell no

Bruh.

You're ole miss. And you were bringing in 4 and 5 star recruits. To OXFORD FRICKING MISSISSIPPI.

You can't be any more blatant than that
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59669 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

It's funny how they opened the investigation back up because of draft night and Tunsil is nowhere on the NOA

Who's name was on those Tunsil texts?

Who was named in these new rounds of allegations?

quote:

and 90% of the NOA was from immunity given to rival players.

Posted by AshLSU
Member since Nov 2015
12868 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

Fight that mother fricker to your last breath. NCAA has been corrupt through the whole thing. Were we speeding? Yep. Were we in the flow of traffic? Yes as well. Were we in a Lambo going 150 on the shoulder flicking off the NCAA, hell no. And the NOA proves that. Should we get punished, yes but for what they can prove. It's funny how they opened the investigation back up because of draft night and Tunsil is nowhere on the NOA and 90% of the NOA was from immunity given to rival players. Tunsil was given to them on a silver platter and they couldn't close. You don't think they didn't cross the line to "save face"?


Ahhh. The old "it's not my fault I was speeding, it was the cops fault for clocking me speeding" defense. Let me know how that works out for you.
Posted by MButterfly
Quantico
Member since Oct 2015
6860 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

It's funny how they opened the investigation back up because of draft night and Tunsil is nowhere on the NOA and 90% of the NOA was from immunity given to rival players.

Tunsil was given to them on a silver platter and they couldn't close.


Wouldn't that go against the NOA you just got?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter