This is a lie to make y'all feel better about being snitches. First the lie was Leo didn't snitch and now that it's out there it's he was forced to snitch. If this was so they wouldnt need his testimony. If they could prove Leo took money enough to suspend him they don't have to open Pandora's box by giving a rival schools player immunity. Leo also wouldn't be acting the way he is on social media if he was forced to do this. I know this is a he said she said type deal and you'll probably never look at it honestly but it is common sense. It's who y'all are. First Cam and now Leo.

This post was edited on 3/2/17 at 10:03 am

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Vecchio Cane

Ivory Tower

Member since Jul 2016

17894 posts

Posted on 3/2/17 at 10:18 am to Whereisomaha

quote:
If they could prove Leo took money enough to suspend him they don't have to open Pandora's box by giving a rival schools player immunity.

OK Yancey, this has gone far enough. Your university is going to get hammered because the Football Staff "initiated and facilitated.....impermissible contact" between 2 boosters and a prospective student athlete.

This is in no way a "he said, she said type deal. This is a Former Staff Member A testified and Prospective Student-Athlete B corroborated
type deal.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by peepingcrxxms

Sumrall, MS

Member since Aug 2016

848 posts

Posted on 3/2/17 at 12:54 pm to Whereisomaha

This isn't opening a Pandora's box. The NCAA has been granting immunity for years. Your school and 3 or 4 others ratted on state not that long ago when Sherrill was the coach.

0 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board