Started By
Message
re: Could you have been SEC offensive PLayer of the Year
Posted on 1/15/17 at 1:14 pm to ColoBama
Posted on 1/15/17 at 1:14 pm to ColoBama
quote:
Just because our OL is better than L6U's does not mean it was a great one
Curious why you cherry picked LSU, Alabama has the best offensive line in college football and better than any other team.
Hurts is a great player but behind a offensive line similar to say Kentucky he would not have been mentioned as the SEC offensive player of the year.
The BCS loss could have been more to do with having a new OC than anything else.
Lack of talent had nothing to do with BAMA losing to Clemson. Alabama clearly was the most dominate team in college football and losing the game does not change this it only means you did not win the title
3
Posted on 1/15/17 at 1:18 pm to LCTFAN
quote:Clemson beat Alabama in almost every phase of the game, outside of turnovers and yards rushing.
Alabama clearly was the most dominate team in college football and losing the game does not change this it only means you did not win the title
Clemson had more first downs, a better 3rd down conversion rate, more total yards, more passing yards, less penalties and more time of possession.
Posted on 1/15/17 at 2:32 pm to LCTFAN
quote:
Alabama has the best offensive line in college football and better than any other team.
Posted on 1/15/17 at 3:12 pm to LCTFAN
quote:
Curious why you cherry picked LSU, Alabama has the best offensive line in college football and better than any other team.
Where do you people get this crap? Bama OL is good but not great. They haven't a great in a couple of seasons. If the OL was truly the best in CFB than Bama's offense would be hell of a lot better each of the last few seasons. And the loss to Clemson probably wouldn't have happened. But it did partially because of the OL.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News