Started By
Message
re: thoughts on 6 team expansion?
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:49 am to whitetiger1234
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:49 am to whitetiger1234
quote:
From there you continue the 4 team playoff. Thoughts?
Would rather just go to 8 teams at that point
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:50 am to rockiee
quote:
8 teams
Best scenario in my opinion.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 11:11 am to rockiee
There is no way teams 5-8 have a legit shot to say they should play for the title. top 4 is enough.
The playoff is getting like the targeting penalty: out of hand.
The playoff is getting like the targeting penalty: out of hand.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 11:24 am to rockiee
8 is way too many.
For starters, if after 12 regular season games plus Championship weekend you're still ranked 8th, chances are good you don't deserve a spot at the title because you probably have 2 losses.
Next, the whole "5 P5 champs and 3 at larges" is ridiculous because it's entirely possible upsets happen championship weekend. I mean, if VT were to stun clemson this weekend do they REALLY deserve a shot at a national title? Frick no they don't, not even remotely close.
4 is fine.
For starters, if after 12 regular season games plus Championship weekend you're still ranked 8th, chances are good you don't deserve a spot at the title because you probably have 2 losses.
Next, the whole "5 P5 champs and 3 at larges" is ridiculous because it's entirely possible upsets happen championship weekend. I mean, if VT were to stun clemson this weekend do they REALLY deserve a shot at a national title? Frick no they don't, not even remotely close.
4 is fine.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)