Started By
Message

re: I keep seeing the argument for "the 4 best teams should be in the playoff"

Posted on 12/1/16 at 8:45 pm to
Posted by TouchdownTony
Central Alabama
Member since Apr 2016
9727 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 8:45 pm to
Winning some conferences is not the same as others.

Conference championship by no means means you are better than 3rd place team in another conference.

This why the field has to be expanded.

The bcs was a fine system. No idea why we went to this bullshite.
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46221 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

Winning some conferences is not the same as others.

Conference championship by no means means you are better than 3rd place team in another conference.

That's irrelevant though.

If you were not the best in your conference, then why would you have a shot to be the best in the nation?
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 8:53 pm
Posted by higgs_boson
State College, PA
Member since Sep 2014
22456 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

Conference championship by no means means you are better than 3rd place team in another conference.


To be fair here, I think the issue is that there are two teams who did not win in their own conference who might get in over the winner of their own conference.



Michigan even being in the debate is baffling to me. They will have the same record as whoever their conference champion is.

Ohio State seems to have a stronger argument...







but frick Ohio State.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter