quote:
If you argue Alabama should not have played in the National Championship game in 2011 because they did now win their conference,(Most LSU fans on here make that argument) then how can anyone argue that a team that came in third in their division of their conference should be in the 4 team playoffs? Wisconsin might have been ahead of Michigan in the conference making them #4 in their own conference

That's was only 2 teams. This is 4 team playoff

Michigan is the only team in top 10 to currently have 3 top 10 wins.
That's why they were 5 in the CFP... IDK Washington is in top 4 with no wins over top 15 teams currently and the only team they did play in the top 15 they lost to.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by DawgsLife

Member since Jun 2013

58925 posts

Posted on 12/1/16 at 3:47 pm to boweswi05

quote:
That's was only 2 teams. This is 4 team playoff

I understand that, but they are 4th in their conference. If you put them in there you should put the three teams in their conference in there with them.
Over the course of the season they played better than Michigan.

quote:
Michigan is the only team in top 10 to currently have 3 top 10 wins.

And two losses. Add to that, they have 2 losses in their last 3 games, so they are not playing particularly well right now. Too many people are going with Michigan because of Harbaugh. Most don't even realize that Harbaugh has never won his own conference......ever. Not at Michigan and not at Stanford.

Well, it's clear that the Big 0 was by far the best conference in the country. I wouldn't say a word if they got two teams in the playoffs. My only complaint is when the SEC was by far the most dominate conference there is no way they would have allowed two teams in.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by VABuckeye