Started By
Message

re: '16 Bama and '95 Nebraska. Who ya got?

Posted on 11/27/16 at 2:04 pm to
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

Now tell me again how much stronger and faster are today's college athletes compared to 17 years ago?



todays players are bigger, faster, and stronger. Posting arbitrary metricS from Combine Events Doesnt Prove Your Point.

A simple google search will reveal detailed studies about the size amd athletic performance of CFB players since 1942. You will notice that players are now... Bigger, faster, and stronger than ever before. To say otherwise is to believe that somehow despite 70 years of efforts to get bigger faster stronger, football players have stagnated for almost a qtr century.
This post was edited on 11/27/16 at 2:18 pm
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59669 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

todays players are bigger, faster, and stronger. Posting arbitrary metricS from Combine Events Doesnt Prove Your Point.

well show me your proof. Otherwise, I can state todays' athletes are just soft, pampered millennials and not as tough as older athletes. By your statement, I assume every college player should be running 4.4's and doing 40 reps by now.

Just bc you upgrade your iphone every year doesnt' mean that today's athlete is far superior than 15 years ago.
Posted by CharlotteSooner
Member since Mar 2016
11221 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

todays players are bigger, faster, and stronger.


Here's their roster. They don't look smaller than today's players to me.

LINK

The only 275lb Olineman I see on there is a Fr. So there goes the smaller theory.
Posted by Big EZ Tiger
Member since Jul 2010
24322 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 2:54 pm to
quote:



todays players are bigger, faster, and stronger. Posting arbitrary metricS from Combine Events Doesnt Prove Your Point.


That may all be true (though I don't think there is much of a speed difference), but the triple option (when run extremely well with instinctive players) can really take away size and strength advantages of the D. For instance, Bama dwarfed Georgia Southern's players in 2011 and Georgia Southern's O-line averaged about 270lbs. Yet, it didn't affect their ability to completely run all over Bama's incredible defense. Nebraska had 10x the talent that a team like that had. So you can see why things would be interesting.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter