Started By
Message

re: Joel Klatt on LSU. Is this true Tigers?

Posted on 10/12/16 at 11:55 pm to
Posted by John Maplethorpe
Graubünden, Switzerland
Member since Jun 2010
889 posts
Posted on 10/12/16 at 11:55 pm to
The 70s 80s and 90s are the outlier but the 2000s were the norm. Because you liked them better. Ok.
Posted by Lsuchs
Member since Apr 2013
8073 posts
Posted on 10/13/16 at 12:00 am to
quote:

The 70s 80s and 90s are the outlier but the 2000s were the norm. Because you liked them better. Ok


You aren't very good at this...

I said the 90s were the anomoly not the 2000s.

The 90s are the only decade we were not a top 25 program, dropping all the way down to 35th.

what's so bad about the 70s and 80s? We were a top 20 program.

We were top 10 in the 60s, top 20 in the 70/80s, then fell off the map in the 90s just to return back to top 10 in the 2000s
This post was edited on 10/13/16 at 12:13 am
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
262330 posts
Posted on 10/13/16 at 12:04 am to
quote:

The 70s 80s and 90s are the outlier but the 2000s were the norm. Because you liked them better. Ok.


Your way of thinking is retarded
Posted by T Rey WI
Back in the south where I belong!
Member since Dec 2010
2937 posts
Posted on 10/13/16 at 8:51 am to
quote:

The 70s 80s and 90s are the outlier but the 2000s were the norm.


There is only one "outlier" in the L5U history when you compare there win history vs one of the "Blue Bloods" that they face every year. During the Saban years at L5U they beet Alabama at a roughly 80% clip. The entire remainder of their history from 1895 til 2015 they have won at a clip of roughly 25%.

25% win rate vs the Blue Blood IS their NORM. That rate does not equate to a top program.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter