Started By
Message
re: Danny O'brien released from UT
Posted on 10/10/16 at 6:52 pm to Nguyening
Posted on 10/10/16 at 6:52 pm to Nguyening
It may sound cold, but if they ran a drug test on him prior to medical treatment, is UT responsible for paying those medical bills?
Don't employees typically get fired on the spot when they get hurt on the job, require medical care, and then get tested positive for drugs? And then whose health insurance picks up the costs?
Don't employees typically get fired on the spot when they get hurt on the job, require medical care, and then get tested positive for drugs? And then whose health insurance picks up the costs?
3
Posted on 10/10/16 at 6:55 pm to East Coast Band
How do we label a kid and Coke head and not have any proof... Damn kangaroo courts. Lol
Posted on 10/10/16 at 7:01 pm to East Coast Band
Employer responsible for initial treatment. If drug test comes back positive, employer not responsible for any future medical bills.
Posted on 10/10/16 at 7:09 pm to East Coast Band
quote:
It may sound cold, but if they ran a drug test on him prior to medical treatment, is UT responsible for paying those medical bills?
Don't employees typically get fired on the spot when they get hurt on the job, require medical care, and then get tested positive for drugs? And then whose health insurance picks up the costs?
We'll pay. UT has been good about paying for costs even for kids who had to quit for legit medical reasons and even those who decided they just weren't cut out for it. But I see your point.
This post was edited on 10/10/16 at 7:11 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News