Started By
Message
4
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:30 pm to bamasgot13
Because external pressures want a pound of flesh.
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:32 pm to bamasgot13
They did.
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:32 pm to bamasgot13
They did. For WBB and Track which this ruling was on. Just showing how on it our legal team is. If things change ok but based off the NOA our legal team was right on with how it handled WBB and track.
Also read the release the split happened when the football investigation reopened after you read it not once they found new stuff.
Also read the release the split happened when the football investigation reopened after you read it not once they found new stuff.
This post was edited on 10/7/16 at 2:36 pm
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:40 pm to bamasgot13
quote:
Then why didn't they accept Ole Miss' self proposed sanctions?
In fairness, from a program standpoint they pretty much did. They didn't add any scholarship or postseason bans on top of those already self imposed by Ole Miss.
What they did add was a shait-ton of show-causes including both head coaches. Were I an OM staffer named in the football report, I'd be making sure I had my real estate or insurance sales license up to date.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News