quote:
I don't have a problem with A&M, UT, or BAMA being #1.

A&M has 3 power 5 wins and only one of the 4 games were close. Bama's big win over USCw isn't looking overly impressive like we all thought and needed a major comeback vs Ole Miss. If we are baseing it 100% of resume this year and how each team has looked. It isn't hard to make an argument for A&M over Bama.

Like I said, I don't have a problem with it - I only find it amusing it's the ONE person doing it.

The major comeback vs OM, now with what happened to UGA firmly in view, isn't "bad" at all. We all knew Chad Kelly was Alabama's kryptonite.

As far as USCw... true, their record isn't good at all. That said, comparing the loss to Alabama to their other losses (@ #6 Stanford, @ #18 Utah), it's still pretty brutal.

Though I agree, and not a huge fan of transitive property, UCLA and USC looked fairly identical against Stanford (when you take into account home field advantage). If those are a wash, then I would concede that A&M's win over Arkansas looks better overall than Alabama's win over OM (OM might be the better team, but A&M did a much better job vs Arkansas), and beating Auburn is at least a tad better than beating WKU.

So no, I would not have a problem with anyone voting A&M over us. I think it's pretty clear those are the two best teams in the SEC, though Tennessee and Ole Miss are going to be dangerous for anyone that plays them.

Thankfully, it will be settled on the field :) Looking forward to a DAMN good game in a few weeks.