Started By
Message
re: Hit on Kelly vs Hurts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:41 pm to droliver
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:41 pm to droliver
quote:
The hit on Hurts was, by definition, a targeting foul.
The hit on Kelly was legal, but should be legislated out of the game as its dangerous to allow these guys to come flying in to "blow up" a ball carrier rather then make a true tackle.
Neither player ia defenseless and the hits are near identical in delivery
2
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:44 pm to bmy
You're seriously arguing that Ruben obliterating LF is targeting, but the hit on Hurts wasn't? Because the Ole Miss player absolutely lowered his head and hit Hurts just as high. 
Posted on 9/19/16 at 11:15 pm to bmy
quote:you are dumb as a bag of rocks
Neither player ia defenseless and the hits are near identical in delivery
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News