Started By
Message
re: Hit on Kelly vs Hurts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:26 pm to harmonics
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:26 pm to harmonics
The hit on Hurts was, by definition, a targeting foul.
The hit on Kelly was legal, but should be legislated out of the game as its dangerous to allow these guys to come flying in to "blow up" a ball carrier rather then make a true tackle.
The hit on Kelly was legal, but should be legislated out of the game as its dangerous to allow these guys to come flying in to "blow up" a ball carrier rather then make a true tackle.
1
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:41 pm to droliver
quote:
The hit on Hurts was, by definition, a targeting foul.
The hit on Kelly was legal, but should be legislated out of the game as its dangerous to allow these guys to come flying in to "blow up" a ball carrier rather then make a true tackle.
Neither player ia defenseless and the hits are near identical in delivery
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News