Started By
Message

re: Official SECr Power Rankings, Week 2

Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:36 am to
Posted by Robert Duval
Member since Jul 2015
421 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:36 am to
At the risk of sounding like a total homer, I don't see how you drop Auburn a spot to the lowest conceivable position after last week. I know there are now some questions about Clemson w/their struggle vs Troy...but LOTS of good teams have struggled a bit vs poor competition this year.

With a HORRIBLE game plan on offense that will never be seen again, Auburn was still in that game until the final whistle. With a better offensive game plan, AU looked MUCH sharper in week 2. And dropped?

Teams that have struggled against poor competition:
UT-and haven't played anyone
UGA-legitimately nearly lost to Nichols state...serious talk of the real possibility of losing to f***ing Mizzou
Arky
UF -kind of, looked good against UK though

All ranked above AU. I also don't see how LSU has a better resume or better prognosis as this point than AU. Clemson>Wisconsin. AU looked far better against their poor opponent than LSU. LSU appears to be in deep shite...Auburn appears to have momentum. Don't get that one at all. AU is favored of TAMU (although by less than the 7 pt swing you typically get from a home game...neutral field, TAMU would be favored). But would any of the teams ranked above Auburn be favored to beat TAMU at home? Besides Bama.
This post was edited on 9/14/16 at 9:38 am
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50915 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:40 am to
quote:

Teams that have struggled against poor competition:
UT-and haven't played anyone
UGA-legitimately nearly lost to Nichols state...serious talk of the real possibility of losing to f***ing Mizzou
Arky
UF -kind of, looked good against UK though



UT, 2-0 with a power 5 win. Easily above Auburn.
UGA, 2-0 with a power 5 win. Easily above Auburn.
UF, 2-0. No power 5 win, but no losses either. Looked good in wins. Argument could be made either way. I would still give the edge to Florida.
Posted by semotruman
Member since Nov 2011
23179 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 11:32 am to
quote:

At the risk of sounding like a total homer, I don't see how you drop Auburn a spot to the lowest conceivable position after last week. I know there are now some questions about Clemson w/their struggle vs Troy...but LOTS of good teams have struggled a bit vs poor competition this year.

I'm not sure that was a reflection on Auburn. It's early and there was a lot of movement this week, with teams going up and down. I think it's more likely it was a feeling like other teams performed much higher or lower than expectations.

Like I said, it's early. Keep playing well, and Auburn will keep climbing.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79472 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 11:40 am to
quote:

At the risk of sounding like a total homer, I don't see how you drop Auburn a spot to the lowest conceivable position after last week. I know there are now some questions about Clemson w/their struggle vs Troy...but LOTS of good teams have struggled a bit vs poor competition this year.



Eh, I don't mind where we are generally, but I don't see how you can put LSU over Auburn unless you're going off of paper potential...which makes no sense in "power rankings"
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter