Started By
Message
re: Tennessee is 44-44 since Phillip Fulmer stepped down in 2008
Posted on 8/24/16 at 12:01 pm to TOSOV
Posted on 8/24/16 at 12:01 pm to TOSOV
I learned in this thread that Tennessee basically had two good periods in their entire history that make them all feel like they have an "elite" program.
I hate to tell you guys but no one gives a shite about the 20's, 30's or the fricking 90's.
I hate to tell you guys but no one gives a shite about the 20's, 30's or the fricking 90's.
3
Posted on 8/24/16 at 12:16 pm to TigerCruise
quote:
but no one gives a shite about the 20's, 30's or the fricking 90's.
Nebraska football says hi
Posted on 8/24/16 at 12:20 pm to TigerCruise
quote:
I learned in this thread that Tennessee basically had two good periods in their entire history that make them all feel like they have an "elite" program. I hate to tell you guys but no one gives a shite about the 20's, 30's or the fricking 90's.
La-De-Da.
Mizzou all time WP: .550
Mizzou's first game - 1890
UT all time WP: .679.
UT's first game 1891.
"As of November 28, 2015 Tennessee is ranked 10th all-time won-lost records by percentage and eighth by victories. The all-time record is 819-374-53 (.679). At Neyland Stadium, the Vols have a record of 454–123–17 (.779)." -wiki
Thanks for continuing to parade the irrelevance of Missouri.
Faurot Field at Memorial Stadium: 71,168
Neyland Stadium: 102,455
Walt
UT '81
This post was edited on 8/24/16 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 8/24/16 at 12:23 pm to TigerCruise
quote:
I learned in this thread that Tennessee basically had two good periods in their entire history that make them all feel like they have an "elite" program
yeah the win pct, wins, conference and national championships, bowls and bowl wins, all Americans, etc don't mean shite do they?
LINK
How come if we have only had 2 good periods ever, this article has us in the top 10 teams of the decade for the 30s, 40s, 60s, 90s, and 00s?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News