Started By
Message

Simms

Posted on 8/13/16 at 10:16 am
Posted by navynuke
Member since Jun 2016
6524 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 10:16 am
I'm not sure if this is true or a typo:

quote:

Simms, a 6-5 manchild from East St. Louis, doesn’t need the typical first-year college diet to add bulk. He’s already 345 pounds but light enough on his feet to patrol the edge.


LINK
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 10:21 am to
listed at 290 in HS. damn
Posted by surgicalvenom
Omaha
Member since Jan 2014
6596 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 1:57 pm to
Sounds amazing, but looking at his pics coming in, if he is 6'4-6'5, did you relly believe he was 290? I have a feeling he left 290 behind freshman year.
Posted by navynuke
Member since Jun 2016
6524 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 2:07 pm to
He is listed at 315 on Rock M's depth chart. If he can carry the weight, good on him. 345 is 10 lbs heavier than Orlando Pace weighed at the 1997 combine.
Posted by semotruman
Member since Nov 2011
23188 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

He is listed at 315 on Rock M's depth chart. If he can carry the weight, good on him. 345 is 10 lbs heavier than Orlando Pace weighed at the 1997 combine.


Yeah, we have some big boys. If they can carry it and still move, OK. But some of these weights don't seem healthy to me. Can't be good for their knees and hips.
Posted by BurgTiger
Member since Feb 2014
3350 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 3:55 pm to
Nothing about the game of football is good for ones joints, bones, or brains. The reward is college, a little fame, and girls and the cost is the last few decades of mobility.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter