Started By
Message
re: Kentucky claims 1950 football national championship
Posted on 7/26/16 at 6:16 pm to MizzouTrue
Posted on 7/26/16 at 6:16 pm to MizzouTrue
It sucks the loss to Kansas was overturned late after the result. Missouri was #1 before the loss. Since they got the win back, it was too late unfortunately.
Missouri should have been national champions for 1960. Instead, an 8-1 Minnesota won it before losing the Rose Bowl. 10-0-1 Ole Miss was left out, and rightfully so for certain reasons.
Only reason why UK won 1950 SEC over Tennessee is because of more SEC games played. Both UT and UK had one conference loss. Tennessee has more of a claim than Kentucky.
Missouri should have been national champions for 1960. Instead, an 8-1 Minnesota won it before losing the Rose Bowl. 10-0-1 Ole Miss was left out, and rightfully so for certain reasons.
Only reason why UK won 1950 SEC over Tennessee is because of more SEC games played. Both UT and UK had one conference loss. Tennessee has more of a claim than Kentucky.
1
Posted on 7/26/16 at 6:21 pm to Oklahomey
The fact that some SEC teams played more conference games than others shows how frickin old this all is
Also, black players weren't allowed in 1950
Those players lived their most of their lives not even knowing they were national champions...
Also, black players weren't allowed in 1950
Those players lived their most of their lives not even knowing they were national champions...
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News