Started By
Message
re: Sports Illustrated Article on Ole Miss SIAP
Posted on 6/29/16 at 2:29 pm to pankReb
Posted on 6/29/16 at 2:29 pm to pankReb
quote:
Where in the article did it say that the bank statements confirmed that Ole Miss helped them move?
So are you accusing the article of making mention of bank statements being provided to the NCAA simply for the sake of suggesting that Ole Miss did wrong? Why else would Miller submit such evidence to the NCAA?
quote:
They can assume whatever the frick they want....doesn't mean it's true.
So your argument is essentially, "The evidence may suggest one thing but you'll never really know cause you weren't there"? Do you think that's going to save Ole Miss from potential sanctions?
Posted on 6/29/16 at 2:35 pm to tylerdurden24
quote:
So are you accusing the article of making mention of bank statements being provided to the NCAA simply for the sake of suggesting that Ole Miss did wrong? Why else would Miller submit such evidence to the NCAA?
The bank statements showed proof that Miller was given cash by a booster, per the article. The dollar amount in this article matches the dollar amount that is included in our response to the NOA.
The article does NOT say that his bank statements prove that Ole Miss helped fund their move.
You are free to show me where, in the article, it says that the bank statements DID show proof of funding their move.
Extra credit: Ask yourself why this wasn't included in the NOA if Miller showed the NCAA proof that Ole Miss funded their move.
quote:
So your argument is essentially, "The evidence may suggest one thing but you'll never really know cause you weren't there"?
ummm....where in the hell are you coming up with that? My argument is pretty simple....everything that Miller has proof of in this article was already included in the NOA
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)