Started By
Message

re: DA's Reasoning for Dropping Cam's Charges...

Posted on 6/20/16 at 2:27 pm to
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 6/20/16 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

The only possible charge was possession of a stolen firearm, and that was easily explainable, traceable, and likely turned up no evidence of a crime. And the weapon was likely found from an illegal search of the car. Nothing else was a crime.

What are you talking about? It's a felony to be in possession of a dangerous controlled substance and a firearm at the same time - regardless of if the firearm was stolen or not.

Someone got paid off, plain and simple. It's Louisiana after all.
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
70975 posts
Posted on 6/20/16 at 2:30 pm to
I know everyone around here, Bama fans included, would love for the DA to have been paid off to get these charges dropped.

But I just don't see it happening. There is too much incompetence involved to make the payments necessary.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter