Started By
Message
re: If Gus' contract extension was about recruiting...
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:57 pm to Weagle25
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:57 pm to Weagle25
quote:
Make a better argument and maybe I'll agree with you
Put it this way: Was recruiting a priority when Kodi Burns was selected to replace DC? An unproven former player?
Don't get me wrong. Burns might turn out to be a great position coach/recruiter, but somebody in Auburn is pissing on your heads and telling you its raining. And a large group of AU people are truly believing its rain.
2
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:02 pm to stomp
quote:
Was recruiting a priority when Kodi Burns was selected to replace DC? An unproven former player?
Yes. That was primarily why he was hired.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:04 pm to stomp
quote:
Put it this way: Was recruiting a priority when Kodi Burns was selected to replace DC? An unproven former player?
That decision has nothing to do with this decision.
You can say "We need a better coach at WR coach instead of a recruiter" and still have recruiting as a main priority.
And I'm pretty sure DC left because he didn't see an opportunity to advance at Auburn as long as Malzahn was there so not much we could do there even if we wanted to keep him.
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 3:06 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News