Started By
Message

re: Ole Miss Recruiting Question

Posted on 5/23/16 at 10:23 am to
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30306 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 10:23 am to
quote:

UNC was way more complicated that OM. UNC was making fake classes for athletes over a span of almost 20 yrs. OM basically revolves around recruitment issues of a handful of players. Apples and oranges. OM won't drag out nearly as long as UNC


Don't y'all have some academic fraud mixed in that NOA too? Certainly nowhere close to the scale of UNC, but that Sanders stuff could be serious.
Posted by TampaReb
Member since Aug 2015
1823 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 10:26 am to
That stuff is serious. I'm interested to see how our Saunders infractions match ULLs.
Posted by fillmoregandt
OTM
Member since Nov 2009
14368 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 10:27 am to
quote:

Don't y'all have some academic fraud mixed in that NOA too? Certainly nowhere close to the scale of UNC, but that Sanders stuff could be serious.


Technically yes, but a rogue coach fudging a couple ACT scores is completely different than systemic, university sanctioned fake-classes over an 18 yrs span
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter